March 28, 2024

7 thoughts on “40% of the Cost of Beer is Taxes… And Other Sobering Tax Day Facts

  1. Once again, let’s look a little deeper, shall we? The Federal Excise tax on beer is 5 cents per 12 oz drink. Hardly a great burden imposed by Uncle Sam. The “40%” figure is quite erroneous. Not even in the ballpark. Unless you but some REAL CHEAP beer..at say…11 or 12 cents a glass. (I wish). The other “taxes” are what every business pays…income taxes, payroll taxes, etc. The other state taxes cannot be blamed on Uncle Sam. Blame Uncle Andy. So, the fact is that Uncle Sam (the federal government) puts a special 5 cents per 12 oz tax on a brew.
    But wait…that is only for big breweries. For small breweries the federal excise tax is only 2 cents per 12 oz. They get a break.
    But let’s dig deeper. The excise tax on beer has not been raised since 1991. Almost 25 years. And it is NOT a percentage tax, it is a per barrel tax. Why is that important? Because, adjusted for inflation, the $ 18.00 per barrel tax in 1991 would be about $64.00 per barrel today. Or about 20 cents per 12 oz serving today. In fact, by comparison the beer excise tax has been lowered in relation to all other taxes.
    I am not sure what the beer industry is griping about. Just an example of manipulating statistics to show whatever they want too show. Wouldn’t it be ironic if the Congress, seeing how the beer industry has been paying a lower real tax rate all these years, decided to raise the excise tax ?
    Gotta go. All this beer talk has made me thirsty.

    1. Herein, not a single refutation of the fact that 40% of the cost of beer is taxes.

      Why is it acceptable that 40%of the cost of anything comprised of taxes?

      1. Well. Yes. The refutation is clear. The first inaccuracy of the blog says that 40% of the cost of a glass of beer goes to UNCLE SAM (the federal government) . False. The federal excise tax is only 5 cents per 12 oz. Minimal.
        Second. Once again, those who pretend we have high taxes are playing fast and loose with data. For example, they include all the “assumed” taxes including state and local income taxes, unemployment tax, Social Security, etc. which everyone pays. Of course, all these awful taxes are returned to you…and the beer industry..in the form of great road systems which allow easy and safe delivery. Police protection which allows the business to operate without hiring very expensive security details. Insurance for workers if they get injured on the job. Etc. One of the great fallacies of the “my taxes are too high” folks is that they don’t seem to understand how they benefit from all the services provided by taxes. Perhaps a good cost-benefit analysis is in order.
        Of course we all believe we “over pay” our taxes. But the beer industry does not. And neither do the hundreds of US corporations who pay no federal income tax. (Companies like Wells Fargo, Boeing, General Electric and Verizon are just a few examples). But that’s ok. Thanks to Congress you and I are taking up the slack.

        1. Uncle Sam/Uncle Andy. OK. Non-issue. Everybody gets what I mean.

          Your logic of more and more government services can be extended to ever-increasing tax rates. Why not tax everyone 90%? Leave the 10% to discretionary spending and have everything else “provided” by government?

          Now, you’ll shoot back and say I’m advocating for 0% taxes. No, there are some services only government can provide, like military, national security, and the judicial system. So there is need for some minimal level of taxation.

          Still, many government services can be equally or better provided by the private sector, such as private roads. Don’t forget that all of these great government services are paid for by the people, which means government is simply one avenue by which to pay for these services. Often, government monopolizes or crowds out private investment certain areas, so it’s hard to see how the private sector could actually provide what government does in an economical manner. For example, look at UPS/FedEx compared to UPS, or private space companies compared to NASA.

          And the point remains: why should 40% of the cost of anything consist of taxes? When you look at it that way–when beer-guzzling college students look at the issue that way–perhaps they will begin to see the light.

          1. Private roads? What are you talking about? Should every road be a toll road?
            FedEx and UPS are not required to handle junk mail, are they? Nor will they deliver a letter across the nation for 50 cents. In other words, they are able to skim off the more lucrative aspects of delivery and not the more costly aspects. In addition, they avoided paying into the unemployment system for years by categorizing their work force as “contractors”.
            Regarding “private space companies”. Are you kidding? The US taxpayer has spent billions of dollars (maybe more) developing space technologies. Going way back to the 1950s. Taking the risks necessary to develop the industry. Having some successes and learning from costly failures. Then, after the taxpayer has financed the basic research, taken the risks, developed an entirely new industry, only then does the “private sector” come in and take over. After the massively expensive research has been done on the taxpayer’s dime.
            In fact, the very internet we all use was developed by “big government” with taxpayer dollars. No private investor had the ability to fiinance that undertaking.
            I am curious. In what areas do you think government monopolizes or crowds out private investment? I see the opposite happening. The taxpayers take all the risks and “private enterprise” takes the result for free and profits from it. Nice work if you can get it.

  2. A lot of foaming here, but that is expected, since this topic is about beer, and taxes.

Comments are closed.