Cornell Students to Decide Whether to #FreetheTampon

Free tampons may be on the way to all bathrooms on Cornell’s campus — men’s included.

screen-shot-2016-09-17-at-7-57-51-pm

Over 2,300 people have signed a petition sponsored by Student Assembly (SA) president Jordan Berger ’17 to provide pads and tampons free of charge in all Cornell bathrooms. Having received more than 10% of the undergraduate student body’s signatures, the petition will go forward to a vote next week.

The petition reads: “Should pads and tampons be available free of charge to students in all bathrooms on campus?”

The movement, also known as “Free the Tampon,” has garnered significant support recently, and not just at Cornell. Brown University now stocks their bathrooms—yes—both genders, with feminine hygiene products, a decision that has been implemented this year.

At Brown and Cornell, students in support of “freeing the tampon” are adamant that these products should be freely available because they are “as necessary as toilet paper,” and that “not all people who menstruate are women” (when accounting for trans-gendered people).

Aside from the referendum’s subject matter, the real problem is the lack of detail regarding how this initiative would be funded and administered.

The cost of feminine products per person per month is roughly $7. At Cornell, there are over 14,000 undergraduates, 5,000 graduate students, and 2,300 professional staff according to the university. Keeping every bathroom on campus stocked with enough tampons and pads for half of this population (not including the men that menstruate) would potentially cost hundreds of thousands of dollars annually. Furthermore, would it fall under each college’s budgetary discretion to fund this initiative, or would Day Hall directly oversee everything?

There is also the issue of students, even those with more than enough means to self-provide, taking extra tampons and pads if they are freely, indefinitely available. Tampons and pads are much more easily taken and stuffed away in a bag than, say, toilet paper or hand soap.

That brings us to the next flaw in the proposal. Tampons and pads are not necessary. While they are the menstrual product of choice for most women, there are other reusable options that are far less expensive. A menstrual cup, for example, costs around $35 and can last ten years.

It’s worth noting that this money would only benefit half of the population. Since when does responsibility for providing women’s toiletry items fall unto men as well? This goes directly against the idea of women being self-sufficient in the modern age — something women have fought to achieve for decades.

And, because it clearly needs to be said: biology is unfair, and there are some things that women need that men don’t and vice versa.

There are alternatives that can accomplish the goals of Referendum #30 without superfluously spending thousands of dollars. Many public restrooms nationwide offer dispensers with tampons and pads for 25 cents, machines that Cornell already has in some bathrooms on campus. Installing these in more Cornell bathrooms would be a much more affordable option that would provide students with a solution to an emergency need.

For those students struggling to afford feminine hygiene products, perhaps the SA could work with Gannett to sponsor a more monitored system where students in need could go for tampons, pads, or the more cost-effective moon cup. While this would still cost money, it is a less costly compromise that would have oversight to prevent those who may take advantage.

At Cornell, there never seems to be a lack of complaining about tuition hikes or other campus costs each year while at the same time a consistent demand for more free stuff. It’s time to realize we just can’t have it both ways.

5 Comments on Cornell Students to Decide Whether to #FreetheTampon

  1. I’m very upset about this new proposal to provide feminine hygiene products in men’s bathrooms. The sight of these products in what was until now a males-only “safe space” triggers me so that I feel very unsafe. Although these males-only bathrooms are divisive and deny menstruating male students the inclusivity desired by the overwhelming majority of Cornell students, has anyone given one single thought to the crushing disappointments that are borne by biologically-assigned males who are unable to participate in the monthly cycle of menstruation, or in the gestation of their own infants? As an already-marginalized victim of these unfair life realities, why must Cornell move deliberately to augment the daily slights and micro-aggressions that constantly reaffirm the second-class victimhood and dehumanization of those persons who happen to be anatomically male through nobody’s fault?

    It is time to say, “Enough!” It seems that kicking a male person while he is down is no longer an adequate humiliation; now Cornell seems to want to douse such a male person with gasoline and then throw a lit match to watch that male person burn. When will we open our eyes to this overt hatred and learn to love our fellow hu-person?

  2. “hu-person”

    hu-perSON

    SON !!!

    Sexism at its worst! Favoring one gender over all the others!

    I am having a PANIC ATTACK !!

    Next time please use the correct, administratively-authorized term, huperchild.

  3. What a disgustingly sexist article. “Tampons and pads are not necessary.” Try telling that to the average woman whose period comes early and catches her off-guard so she has to stuff toilet paper into her vagina because she doesn’t carry around quarters so she can’t buy a tampon from the dispenser. You clearly don’t menstruate so stop telling us women what we do and do not need.
    Periods are highly inconvenient and highly unpredictable. It’s impossible to be 100% prepared at all times. This petition is not so much about helping women afford these products as it is about helping women not bleed through their fucking pants. Cornell will obviously only provide the cheapest products available, so the majority of women would still supply themselves with more comfortable options. The free ones would serve for the most part as a last resort for women who aren’t prepared — something that is in everyone’s best interest.
    “It’s worth noting that this money would only benefit half of the population”. That seems like a pretty sizable percentage if you ask me! Should every policy decision be nixed unless 100% of the population benefit? Maybe we should get rid of financial aid too. Why should the responsibility of financing a college education fall on the rich?
    Stupid article written by a stupid, selfish man.

Comments are closed.

UA-64354029-1